GEO Isn’t “Maps SEO”. It’s Recruitment Trust at Scale (and every type of agency needs it)
Shazamme System User • February 11, 2026
If your “location strategy” is basically a Google Business Profile and a page that says “We recruit globally”… I’m going to be blunt:
That’s not a strategy. That’s a brochure with Wi-Fi.
GEO in 2026 isn’t about getting pinned on a map. It’s about being the obvious choice in a specific place, for a specific recruitment need, at a specific moment.
And here’s the part people miss: even when someone doesn’t type a city, search engines often infer location from context and device signals. So you might think you’re competing with “everyone”. In reality, you’re competing with whoever looks most credible for that market.
GEO is how you win that credibility.
GEO matters whether you’re local, national, or global
This isn’t just for “local agencies”. It’s for every setup:
- You recruit across the entire USA
- You recruit only in specific US states (say, Texas and California)
- You recruit across the UK
- You recruit in specific UK regions (Greater London and the South East)
- You recruit across Australia
- You recruit only in NSW and Victoria
- You operate in two countries (UK + Dubai, or Singapore + Australia, or USA + Canada)
- You’re “global” but your delivery is clearly strongest in a few hubs
All of these need location clarity. Just in different shapes.
Because employers and candidates don’t buy “global”. They buy “relevant to me, where I am”.
Why most recruitment location pages fail
Because they’re written for bots, not humans.
You’ve seen the classic: “Recruitment Agency [City]” with 200 generic words, a skyline photo, and absolutely nothing that proves the agency understands that market.
Thin pages don’t build trust. They don’t convert. And over time, search engines learn to ignore them.
A strong GEO page answers real questions, like:
- What roles do you recruit for here?
- What industries are active here?
- What do recruitment timelines look like in this market?
- What local compliance, licensing, or work authorisation realities matter?
- What outcomes have you delivered in markets like this?
In other words:
local clarity, local proof, local usefulness.

The GEO framework that works for every location setup
The goal is not “make a page for every place”. The goal is “make your operating footprint obvious, and make each market page genuinely helpful”.
Here’s how to do that, whether you’re one-city, multi-state, or multi-country.
1) Choose your footprint model (and build around it)
Model A: You recruit across an entire country
Example: “We recruit across the USA” or “nationwide across the UK”.
Your website should have:
- a country hub page (United States / United Kingdom / Australia)
- regional hubs that reflect reality (not every city on Earth)
- discipline pages that explain specialisation clearly
- live jobs that can be filtered by region
USA example (national footprint)
- /locations/united-states/
- /locations/united-states/northeast/
- /locations/united-states/south/
- /locations/united-states/midwest/
- /locations/united-states/west/
Plus metro pages where you genuinely recruit heavily (New York, Dallas, LA).
UK example (national footprint)
- /locations/united-kingdom/
- /locations/united-kingdom/london/
- /locations/united-kingdom/manchester/
- /locations/united-kingdom/birmingham/
- /locations/united-kingdom/scotland/ (if relevant)
And key sectors layered on top.
Australia example (national footprint)
- /locations/australia/
- /locations/australia/sydney/
- /locations/australia/melbourne/
- /locations/australia/brisbane/
- /locations/australia/perth/
- /locations/australia/adelaide/
This structure tells search engines and humans: “Yes, we recruit nationally, and here’s how that breaks down.”
Model B: You recruit only in specific states or regions
Example: “We recruit in Texas and California only.” Or “We operate across NSW and Victoria.”
This is where GEO becomes your unfair advantage, because your site can be more specific than the “we do everywhere” agencies.
USA example (state-specific footprint)
- /locations/texas/
- /locations/california/
Each page should feel like a market hub, not a placeholder.
Australia example (state-specific footprint)
- /locations/new-south-wales/
- /locations/victoria/
UK example (region-specific footprint)
- /locations/greater-london/
- /locations/south-east/
- /locations/midlands/ (if relevant)
The big rule here: don’t pretend you’re everywhere. Being confidently specific converts better and builds more trust.
Model C: You recruit in two (or a few) countries
Example: UK + Dubai, Singapore + Australia, USA + Canada.
This is common in recruitment, and it’s also where most websites become confusing. They mix markets, currencies, compliance language, and job expectations… and everyone quietly loses confidence.
Your structure should make it crystal clear:
- /locations/united-kingdom/
- /locations/united-arab-emirates/dubai/
or - /locations/singapore/
- /locations/australia/
Each country hub must speak in that market’s language:
- currency and pay norms
- spelling and terminology
- role titles that match the market
- compliance and work authorisation realities (only if you’re accurate)
- contact paths that make sense for that region
If you recruit UK + Dubai, don’t blend them into one generic “global” page. That’s how you look like you don’t understand either.
Model D: You have offices in a few places but recruit wider
Example: offices in London and Sydney, but you recruit across the UK and Australia.
Your site should show both:
- office locations (trust signal)
- service coverage (your true footprint)
Think:
- country hubs for coverage
- metro pages for office markets
- clear “we recruit across X, with hubs in Y” messaging
This prevents the “but do you actually operate here?” doubt.
2) Make every location page “answer-ready” (AEO + GEO together)
If AI summaries are going to answer “best recruiter in London” or “temp staffing in Dallas” or “engineering recruitment in Sydney”, you want them pulling from your site.
So near the top of each location page, include a short, quotable block:
Answer block template
“We recruit for [roles] across [location], specialising in [industries]. Employers work with us to achieve [outcome], and candidates use us to access [benefit]. Typical recruitment timelines in this market range from [range], depending on [variables].”
Example: Texas
“We recruit across Texas, specialising in manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare roles. Employers work with us to secure reliable talent fast, and candidates use us for consistent opportunities and straight answers on pay and shift expectations. Typical recruitment timelines range from a few days for volume roles to several weeks for specialist hires.”
Example: Greater London
“We recruit across Greater London, specialising in technology, finance, and business support. Employers work with us for fast shortlists and market-led salary guidance, and candidates use us to access roles that match their experience without wasting time. Recruitment timelines typically range from 2–6 weeks depending on role scarcity and urgency.”
3) Put proof where decisions happen
A location page without proof is just a claim.
On each hub, show:
- outcome metrics (shortlist speed, time-to-fill ranges, retention, volume)
- testimonials tied to the market or role type
- client types served (anonymised is fine)
- recent placement snapshots (anonymised is fine)
Challenger brands don’t win by being louder. They win by being clearer and more credible.
4) Connect location pages to live jobs and market-specific content
A location page should be a switchboard, not a dead end.
Add:
- live roles filtered to that location
- links to sector pages relevant in that market
- salary guides by role + location
- employer recruitment guides specific to that market
- candidate advice that reflects local realities
Here’s what that looks like:
If you recruit across the USA
- USA hub links to: tech recruitment USA, healthcare staffing USA, salary guide: RN pay by state, recruiting contractors in the US
If you only recruit in Texas + California
- Texas hub links to: warehouse roles Texas, manufacturing recruitment Texas, salary guide: supervisors in Texas, recruitment timelines Texas
- California hub links to: tech recruitment California, executive search California, salary guide: software engineers California, offer competition strategies
If you recruit across the UK
- UK hub links to: finance recruitment UK, IT recruitment UK, contractor recruitment UK, salary guide: London vs Manchester
If you recruit only in London + South East
- London hub links to: finance roles London, tech roles London, contractor market London, salary guide: project managers London
- South East hub links to: logistics recruitment South East, engineering recruitment South East, salary guide: shift roles South East
If you recruit across Australia
- Australia hub links to: construction recruitment Australia, healthcare recruitment Australia, salary guide by city, recruitment timelines by state
If you recruit in UK + Dubai
- UK hub content: UK market norms, UK salary guidance, UK compliance language
- Dubai hub content: UAE market norms, visa/work authorisation guidance (only if accurate), local salary expectations, sector focus
If you recruit in Singapore + Australia
- Singapore hub: local sector focus, local role titles, local salary norms
- Australia hub: state and city breakdowns, local compliance and pay norms
5) Keep market signals consistent (don’t accidentally look clueless)
This is where global sites quietly lose trust:
- wrong currency for the page
- wrong spelling and terminology
- role titles that don’t match the market
- generic “global” claims with no local proof
- contact options that don’t fit the region
If your London page reads like a California page, you don’t look international. You look copy-pasted.
The GEO + zero click power move: publish market pages people actually save
If you want to win in local search and AI answers, publish content that feels like it came from a recruiter who knows the market:
- salary guides by role and location
- “recruitment market update” pages by region (quarterly is enough)
- recruitment timeline benchmarks by role
- work authorisation, licensing, compliance explainers where relevant
- “how to recruit [role] in [location]” employer guides
These pages get found, get referenced, and convert because they reduce uncertainty.
Where Shazamme and Shout Lab fit (without turning this into a pitch)
A GEO strategy only compounds if it’s connected to distribution.
Your location and market pages should feed:
- social content that’s actually useful
- newsletters segmented by region and niche
- automated nurture for employers and candidates so interest doesn’t leak away
- proof loops that keep trust signals fresh
That’s the ecosystem approach: Shazamme structures the website so search and AI can interpret it properly, and Shout Lab helps distribute and nurture so the brand compounds instead of restarting every week.
The takeaway
GEO isn’t stuffing city names into headings.
It’s making recruitment relevance obvious, useful, and credible at scale.
Whether you recruit across the USA, only in Texas and California, across the UK, just in Greater London, across Australia, only in NSW and Victoria, or across two countries like the UK and Dubai or Singapore and Australia, the rule is the same:
Don’t claim reach. Prove relevance. Market by market.










